Paper detail

Objective Bayesian analysis for spatial Student-t regression models

The choice of the prior distribution is a key aspect of Bayesian analysis. For the spatial regression setting a subjective prior choice for the parameters may not be trivial, from this perspective, using the objective Bayesian analysis framework a reference is introduced for the spatial Student-t regression model with unknown degrees of freedom. The spatial Student-t regression model poses two main challenges when eliciting priors: one for the spatial dependence parameter and the other one for the degrees of freedom. It is well-known that the propriety of the posterior distribution over objective priors is not always guaranteed, whereas the use of proper prior distributions may dominate and bias the posterior analysis. In this paper, we show the conditions under which our proposed reference prior yield to a proper posterior distribution. Simulation studies are used in order to evaluate the performance of the reference prior to a commonly used vague proper prior.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.