Paper detail

(O_8, O_8) contribution to $\bar{B} \to X_s γγ$ at O(α_s)

In this analysis, we present the contribution associated with the chromomagnetic dipole operator O_8 to the double differential decay width dΓ/(ds_1 ds_2) for the inclusive process $\bar{B} \to X_s γγ$. The kinematical variables s_1 and s_2 are defined as s_i=(p_b - q_i)^2/m_b^2, where p_b, q_1, q_2 are the momenta of b-quark and two photons. This contribution (taken at tree level) is of order α_s, like the recently calculated QCD corrections to the contribution of the operator O_7. In order to regulate possible collinear singularities of one of the photons with the strange quark, we introduce a non zero mass m_s for the strange quark. Our results are obtained for exact m_s, which we interpret as a constituent mass being varied between 400 and 600 MeV. Numerically it turns out that the effect of the (O_8, O_8) contribution to the branching ratio of $\bar{B} \to X_s γγ$ does not exceed +0.1 % for any kinematically allowed value of our physical cutoff parameter c, confirming the expected suppression of this contribution relative to the QCD corrections to dΓ_{77}/(ds_1 ds_2).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.