Paper detail

Nystrom Method for Approximating the GMM Kernel

The GMM (generalized min-max) kernel was recently proposed (Li, 2016) as a measure of data similarity and was demonstrated effective in machine learning tasks. In order to use the GMM kernel for large-scale datasets, the prior work resorted to the (generalized) consistent weighted sampling (GCWS) to convert the GMM kernel to linear kernel. We call this approach as ``GMM-GCWS''. In the machine learning literature, there is a popular algorithm which we call ``RBF-RFF''. That is, one can use the ``random Fourier features'' (RFF) to convert the ``radial basis function'' (RBF) kernel to linear kernel. It was empirically shown in (Li, 2016) that RBF-RFF typically requires substantially more samples than GMM-GCWS in order to achieve comparable accuracies. The Nystrom method is a general tool for computing nonlinear kernels, which again converts nonlinear kernels into linear kernels. We apply the Nystrom method for approximating the GMM kernel, a strategy which we name as ``GMM-NYS''. In this study, our extensive experiments on a set of fairly large datasets confirm that GMM-NYS is also a strong competitor of RBF-RFF.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.