Paper detail

NuSTAR observations of the Transient Galactic Black Hole Binary Candidate Swift J1858.6-0814: A New Sibling of V404 Cyg and V4641 Sgr?

Swift J1858.6-0814 was discovered by Swift-BAT on October 25, 2018. Here we report on the first follow-up NuSTAR observation of the source, which shows variability spanning two orders of magnitude in count rate on timescales of ~10-100 s. The power-spectrum of the source does not show any quasi-periodic oscillations or periodicity, but has a large fractional rms amplitude of 147%$\pm3$%, exhibiting a number of large flares throughout the observation. The hardness ratio (defined as $R_{10-79 \rm keV}/R_{3-10 \rm keV}$) of the flares tends to be soft, while the source spans a range of hardness ratios during non-flaring periods. The X-ray spectrum of the source shows strong reflection features, which become more narrow and peaked during the non-flaring intervals. We fit an absorbed relativistic reflection model to the source spectra to place physical constraints on the system. Most notably, we find that the source exhibits a large and varying intrinsic absorbing column density ($N_{\rm H}=1.4-4.2\times10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$). This large intrinsic absorption is further supported by the energy spectra extracted from two flares observed simultaneously by NuSTAR and NICER. We find that the inner accretion disk of the source has a low inclination, $i<29^{\circ}$ ( 3$σ$ upper-limit), while the iron abundance in the disk is close to solar, $A_{\rm Fe}=1.0\pm0.3$. We set a 90% confidence upper limit on the inner radius of the accretion disk of $r_{\rm in}<8 \ r_{\rm ISCO}$, and, by fixing $r_{\rm in}$ to be at $r_{\rm ISCO}$, a 90% confidence lower-limit on the spin of the black hole of $a^{*}>0.0$. Lastly, we compare the properties of Swift J1858.6$-$0814 to those of V404 Cygni and V4641 Sgr, which both show rapid flaring and a strong and variable absorption.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.