Researcher profile

Maica Clavel

Maica Clavel contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Are Low-Frequency Quasi-Periodic Oscillations seen in accretion flows the disk response to a jet instability?

Low Frequency Quasi-Periodic Oscillations or LF QPOs are ubiquitous in BH X-ray binaries and provide strong constraints on the accretion-ejection processes. Although several models have been proposed so far, none has been proven to reproduce all observational constraints and no consensus has emerged yet. We make the conjecture that disks are threaded by a large scale vertical magnetic field that splits it into two radial zones. In the inner Jet Emitting Disk (JED), a near equipartition field allows to drive powerful self-collimated jets, while beyond a transition radius, the disk magnetization is too low and a Standard Accretion Disk (SAD) is settled. In a series of papers, this hybrid JED-SAD disk configuration has been shown to successfully reproduce most multi-wavelength (radio and X-rays) observations, as well as the concurrence with the LFQPOs for the archetypal source GX 339-4. We first analyze the main QPO scenarios provided in the literature: 1) a specific process occurring at the transition radius, 2) the accretion-ejection instability and 3) the solid-body Lense-Thirring disk precession. We recall their main assumptions and shed light on some severe theoretical issues that question the capability to reproduce LF QPOs. We then argue that none of these models could be operating under the JED-SAD physical conditions. We finally propose an alternative scenario where LF QPOs would be the disk response to an instability triggered in the jets, near a magnetic recollimation zone. Such a situation could account for most Type-C QPO phenomenology and is consistent with the global behavior of black hole binaries. The calculation of this non-destructive jet instability remains however to be done. If the existence of this instability is numerically confirmed, then it could also naturally account for the jet wobbling phenomenology seen in various accreting sources.

preprint2020arXiv

NuSTAR observations of the Transient Galactic Black Hole Binary Candidate Swift J1858.6-0814: A New Sibling of V404 Cyg and V4641 Sgr?

Swift J1858.6-0814 was discovered by Swift-BAT on October 25, 2018. Here we report on the first follow-up NuSTAR observation of the source, which shows variability spanning two orders of magnitude in count rate on timescales of ~10-100 s. The power-spectrum of the source does not show any quasi-periodic oscillations or periodicity, but has a large fractional rms amplitude of 147%$\pm3$%, exhibiting a number of large flares throughout the observation. The hardness ratio (defined as $R_{10-79 \rm keV}/R_{3-10 \rm keV}$) of the flares tends to be soft, while the source spans a range of hardness ratios during non-flaring periods. The X-ray spectrum of the source shows strong reflection features, which become more narrow and peaked during the non-flaring intervals. We fit an absorbed relativistic reflection model to the source spectra to place physical constraints on the system. Most notably, we find that the source exhibits a large and varying intrinsic absorbing column density ($N_{\rm H}=1.4-4.2\times10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$). This large intrinsic absorption is further supported by the energy spectra extracted from two flares observed simultaneously by NuSTAR and NICER. We find that the inner accretion disk of the source has a low inclination, $i<29^{\circ}$ ( 3$σ$ upper-limit), while the iron abundance in the disk is close to solar, $A_{\rm Fe}=1.0\pm0.3$. We set a 90% confidence upper limit on the inner radius of the accretion disk of $r_{\rm in}<8 \ r_{\rm ISCO}$, and, by fixing $r_{\rm in}$ to be at $r_{\rm ISCO}$, a 90% confidence lower-limit on the spin of the black hole of $a^{*}>0.0$. Lastly, we compare the properties of Swift J1858.6$-$0814 to those of V404 Cygni and V4641 Sgr, which both show rapid flaring and a strong and variable absorption.

preprint2019arXiv

Chandra Observations of High Energy X-ray Sources Discovered by INTEGRAL

The International Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory (INTEGRAL) satellite has detected in excess of 1000 sources in the ~20-100 keV band during its surveys of the sky over the past 17 years. We obtained 5 ks observations of 15 unclassified IGR sources with the Chandra X-ray Observatory in order to localize them, to identify optical/IR counterparts, to measure their soft X-ray spectra, and to classify them. For 10 of the IGR sources, we detect Chandra sources that are likely (or in some cases certain) to be the counterparts. IGR J18007-4146 and IGR J15038-6021 both have Gaia parallax distances, placing them at 2.5+0.5-0.4 and 1.1+1.5-0.4 kpc, respectively. We tentatively classify both of them as intermediate polar-type Cataclysmic Variables. Also, IGR J17508-3219 is likely to be a Galactic source, but it is unclear if it is a Dwarf Nova or another type of transient. For IGR J17118-3155, we provide a Chandra localization, but it is unclear if the source is Galactic or extragalactic. Based on either near-IR/IR colors or the presence of extended near-IR emission, we classify four sources as Active Galactic Nuclei (IGR J16181-5407, IGR J16246-4556, IGR J17096-2527, and IGR J19294+1327), and IGR J20310+3835 and IGR J15541-5613 are AGN candidates. In addition, we identified an AGN in the INTEGRAL error circle of IGR J16120-3543 that is a possible counterpart.