Paper detail

Numerical study of PbTe-Pb hybrid nanowires for engineering Majorana zero modes

Epitaxial semiconductor-superconductor (SM-SC) hybrid nanowires are potential candidates for implementing Majorana qubits. Recent experimental and theoretical works show that charged impurities in SM remain a major problem in all existing hybrid nanowires, in which the SM is either InAs or InSb while the SC is mainly Al. Here, we theoretically validate the recently proposed PbTe-Pb hybrid nanowire as a potential candidate for Majorana devices. By studying the electrostatic and electronic properties of PbTe nanowires, we demonstrate that the huge dielectric constant of PbTe endows itself a high tolerance of charged impurity, which is a potential advantage over InAs and InSb nanowires. Moreover, we find that the effective axial Landé $g$ factor and Rashba spin-orbit coupling strength of PbTe nanowires are comparable to those of InAs nanowires. The conceivable merits of using Pb as the SC are (i) Pb has a larger superconducting gap, higher critical temperature, and higher parallel critical magnetic field than those of Al; (ii) a superconducting gap comparable with those of InAs-Al and InSb-Al can be induced in PbTe-Pb even by a weak coupling between Pb and PbTe, which simultaneously relieves the adverse renormalization and induced disorder effects on SM from SC; and (iii) Pb film can be grown on PbTe with a thin buffer CdTe layer in between, solving the lattice mismatch problem as an important source of disorder. In the presence of a parallel magnetic field, we show that the typical BdG energy spectrum and tunneling spectroscopy of PbTe-Pb resemble those of InAs and InSb based hybrid nanowires exposed to a tilting magnetic field, as a result of the highly anisotropic Landé $g$ factors of PbTe nanowires. The calculated topological phase diagrams of PbTe-Pb indicate that the multivalley character of PbTe makes it easier than InAs and InSb to access topological superconducting phases.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.