Paper detail

Numerical Simulation of Hot Accretion Flows (II): Nature, Origin, and Properties of Outflow and Their Possible Observational Applications

Previous hydrodynamical (HD) and magnetohydrodynamical (MHD) numerical simulations of hot accretion flows have shown that the mass accretion rate decreases with decreasing radius. Two models have been proposed to explain this result. In the ADIOS model, the inward decrease of accretion rate is because of the loss of gas in the outflow. In the CDAF model, the gas is assumed to be locked in convective eddies, which results in the inward decrease of the accretion rate. We investigate the nature of inward decrease of accretion rate using HD and MHD simulations. We calculate various properties of inflow and outflow, including the mass flux, radial and rotational velocities, temperature, and the Bernoulli parameter ($Be$). Systematic and significant differences between inflow and outflow are found. These results suggest that the inflow and outflow are not dominated by convective turbulence, but are systematic inward and outward motion. We have also analyzed the convective stability of MHD accretion flow and found that they are convectively stable. These results indicate that the ADIOS scenario is favored. The different properties of inflow and outflow also suggest that the mechanisms of producing outflow in HD and MHD flows are buoyancy and centrifugal force associated with the magnetic field, respectively. The latter mechanism is similar to the Blandford & Payne mechanism. We also study the effect of initial conditions in the simulations. We find that the value of $Be$ is mainly determined by the value of $Be$ of the initial condition. We discuss some possible observational applications of our outflow model. These observations include the Fermi bubble observed in the Galaxy center, and winds widely observed in AGNs and black hole X-ray binaries.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.