Paper detail

Number of relevant directions in Principal Component Analysis and Wishart random matrices

We compute analytically, for large $N$, the probability $\mathcal{P}(N_+,N)$ that a $N\times N$ Wishart random matrix has $N_+$ eigenvalues exceeding a threshold $Nζ$, including its large deviation tails. This probability plays a benchmark role when performing the Principal Component Analysis of a large empirical dataset. We find that $\mathcal{P}(N_+,N)\approx\exp(-βN^2 ψ_ζ(N_+/N))$, where $β$ is the Dyson index of the ensemble and $ψ_ζ(κ)$ is a rate function that we compute explicitly in the full range $0\leq κ\leq 1$ and for any $ζ$. The rate function $ψ_ζ(κ)$ displays a quadratic behavior modulated by a logarithmic singularity close to its minimum $κ^\star(ζ)$. This is shown to be a consequence of a phase transition in an associated Coulomb gas problem. The variance $Δ(N)$ of the number of relevant components is also shown to grow universally (independent of $ζ)$ as $Δ(N)\sim (βπ^2)^{-1}\ln N$ for large $N$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.