Paper detail

Number of Particles in Fission Fragments

In current simulations of fission, the number of protons and neutrons in a given fission fragment is almost always obtained by integrating the total density of particles in the sector of space that contains the fragment. Because of the antisymmetry of the many-body wave function of the whole nucleus, this procedure systematically gives noninteger numbers of particles in the fragments. We introduce a novel sampling method to estimate rigorously the probability of finding $Z$ protons and $N$ neutrons in a fission fragment without resorting to projectors, which can sometimes give unwieldy results. When applied on standard Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov many-body states, we show that our approach reproduces indeed the results of full particle-number projection. We then estimate the charge and mass number dispersion of several scission configurations in $^{240}$Pu with and without pairing correlations included. We show that odd-even effects in the charge probability naturally occur within our approach, which could explain the well-known odd-even staggering of charge distributions. Our method is applicable either in static calculations of scission configurations such as, e.g., in the macroscopic-microscopic approach or energy density functional theory, but also in explicitly time-dependent density functional theory simulations of fission.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.