Paper detail

Number of distinct sites visited by a resetting random walker

We investigate the number $V_p(n)$ of distinct sites visited by an $n$-step resetting random walker on a $d$-dimensional hypercubic lattice with resetting probability $p$. In the case $p=0$, we recover the well-known result that the average number of distinct sites grows for large $n$ as $\langle V_0(n)\rangle\sim n^{d/2}$ for $d<2$ and as $\langle V_0(n)\rangle\sim n$ for $d>2$. For $p>0$, we show that $\langle V_p(n)\rangle$ grows extremely slowly as $\sim \left[\log(n)\right]^d$. We observe that the recurrence-transience transition at $d=2$ for standard random walks (without resetting) disappears in the presence of resetting. In the limit $p\to 0$, we compute the exact crossover scaling function between the two regimes. In the one-dimensional case, we derive analytically the full distribution of $V_p(n)$ in the limit of large $n$. Moreover, for a one-dimensional random walker, we introduce a new observable, which we call imbalance, that measures how much the visited region is symmetric around the starting position. We analytically compute the full distribution of the imbalance both for $p=0$ and for $p>0$. Our theoretical results are verified by extensive numerical simulations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.