Paper detail

$Ξ$-nucleus potential for $Ξ^-$ quasifree production in the $^9$Be($K^-$, $K^+$) reaction

We study phenomenologically a $Ξ^-$ production spectrum of the $^9$Be($K^-$, $K^+$) reaction at 1.8 GeV/$c$ within the distorted-wave impulse approximation using the optimal Fermi-averaged $K^- p \to K^+ Ξ^-$ amplitude. We attempt to clarify properties of a $Ξ$-nucleus potential for $Ξ^-$-$^8$Li, comparing the calculated spectrum with the data of the BNL-E906 experiment. The results show a weak attraction in the $Ξ$-nucleus potential for $Ξ^-$-$^8$Li, which can sufficiently explain the data in the $Ξ^-$ quasifree region. The strength of $V_0^Ξ=$ $-17 \pm 6$ MeV is favored within the Woods-Saxon potential, accompanied by the reasonable absorption of $W_0^Ξ=$ $-5$ MeV for $Ξ^-p \to Ξ^0n$, $ΛΛ$ transitions in nuclear medium. It is difficult to determine the value of $W_0^Ξ$ from the data due to the insufficient resolution of 14.7 MeV FWHM. The energy dependence of the Fermi-averaged $K^- p \to K^+ Ξ^-$ amplitude is also confirmed by this analysis, and its importance in the nuclear ($K^-$, $K^+$) reaction is emphasized.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.