Paper detail

Nucleon decay via dimension 6 operators in anomalous U(1)_A SUSY GUT

Nucleon lifetimes for various decay modes via dimension 6 operators are calculated in the anomalous $U(1)_A$ GUT scenario, in which the unification scale $Λ_u$ becomes smaller than the usual supersymmetric (SUSY) unification scale $Λ_G=2\times 10^{16}$ GeV in general. Since the predicted lifetime $τ(p\rightarrow π^0+e^c)$ becomes around the experimental lower bound though it is strongly dependent on the explicit models, the discovery of the nucleon decay in near future can be expected. We explain why the two ratios $R_1\equiv\frac{Γ_{n \rightarrow π^0 + ν^c}}{Γ_{p \rightarrow π^0 + e^c}}$ and $R_2\equiv\frac{Γ_{p \rightarrow K^0 + μ^c}}{Γ_{p \rightarrow π^0 + e^c}}$ are important in identifying grand unification group and we show that three anomalous $U(1)_A$ SUSY GUT models with $SU(5)$, $SO(10)$ and $E_6$ grand unification group can be identified by measuring the two ratios. If $R_1$ is larger than $0.4$, the grand unification group is not $SU(5)$, and moreover if $R_2$ is larger than $0.3$, the grand unification group is implied to be $E_6$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.