Paper detail

Nucleon and Pion Form Factors from $N_f=2+1$ Anisotropic Lattices

We report a recent lattice-QCD calculation of nucleon and pion electromagnetic form factors and nucleon axial form factors, with special emphasis on large $Q^2$. Conventional lattice form-factor calculations can only reach about 2.5 GeV$^2$, but in this work the transfer momentum is pushed as large as 6 GeV$^2$. Here, we demonstrate the results on 2+1-flavor anisotropic clover lattices for the nucleon and pion, comparing with low-$Q^2$ quantities, such as Dirac and Pauli radii, anomalous magnetic moments, $g_A$ and $M_A$. Our approach can be applied to isotropic lattices and lattices with smaller lattice spacing to achieve even larger-$Q^2$ form factors. The form factors are processed to obtain transverse charge and magnetization densities across 2-dimensional impact-parameter space. These measurements could give important theoretical input to experiments, such as those of JLab's 12-GeV program, and provide insight into hadronic structure.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.