Paper detail

Nuclear pairing reduction due to rotation and blocking

Nuclear pairing gaps of normally deformed and superdeformed nuclei are investigated using the particle-number conserving (PNC) formalism for the cranked shell model, in which the blocking effects are treated exactly. Both rotational frequency $ω$-dependence and seniority (number of unpaired particles) $ν$-dependence of the pairing gap $\tildeΔ$ are investigated. For the ground-state bands of even-even nuclei, PNC calculations show that in general $\tildeΔ$ decreases with increasing $ω$, but the $ω$-dependence is much weaker than that calculated by the number-projected Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov approach. For the multiquasiparticle bands (seniority $ν> 2$), the pairing gaps keep almost $ω$-independent. As a function of the seniority $ν$, the bandhead pairing gaps $\tildeΔ(ν,ω=0)$ decrease slowly with increasing $ν$. Even for the highest seniority $ν$ bands identified so far, $\tildeΔ(ν,ω=0)$ remains greater than 70% of $\tildeΔ(ν=0,ω=0)$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.