Paper detail

Nuclear mass predictions with machine learning reaching the accuracy required by $r$-process studies

Nuclear masses are predicted with the Bayesian neural networks by learning the mass surface of even-even nuclei and the correlation energies to their neighbouring nuclei. By keeping the known physics in various sophisticated mass models and performing the delicate design of neural networks, the proposed Bayesian machine learning (BML) mass model achieves an accuracy of $84$~keV, which crosses the accuracy threshold of the $100$~keV in the experimentally known region. It is also demonstrated the corresponding uncertainties of mass predictions are properly evaluated, while the uncertainties increase by about $50$~keV each step along the isotopic chains towards the unknown region. The shell structures in the known region are well described and several important features in the unknown region are predicted, such as the new magic numbers around $N = 40$, the robustness of $N = 82$ shell, the quenching of $N = 126$ shell, and the smooth separation energies around $N = 104$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.