Paper detail

Novel solutions toward high accuracy automatic brain tissue classification in young children

Accurate automatic classification of major tissue classes and the cerebrospinal fluid in pediatric MR scans of early childhood brains remains a challenge. A poor and highly variable grey matter and white matter contrast on T1-weighted MR scans of developing brains complicates the automatic categorization of voxels into major tissue classes using state-of-the-art classification methods (Partial Volume Estimation). Varying intensities across brain tissues and possible tissue artifacts further contribute to misclassification. In order to improve the accuracy of automatic detection of major tissue types and the cerebrospinal fluid in infant's brains within the age range from 10 days to 4.5 years, we propose a new classification method based on Kernel Fisher Discriminant Analysis (KFDA) for pattern recognition, combined with an objective structural similarity index (SSIM) for perceptual image quality assessment. The proposed method performs an optimal partitioning of the image domain into subdomains having different average intensity values and relatively homogeneous tissue intensity. In the KFDA-based framework, a complex non-linear structure of grey matter, white matter and cerebrospinal fluid intensity clusters in a 3D (T1W, T2W, PDW)-space is exploited to find an accurate classification. Based on Computer Vision hypothesis that the Human Visual System is an optimal structural information extractor, the SSIM finds a new role in the evaluation of the quality of classification. A comparison with the state-of-the-art Partial Volume Estimation method using the SSIM index demonstrates superior performance of the local KFDA-based algorithm in low contrast subdomains and more accurate detection of grey matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid patterns in the brain volume.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.