Paper detail

Notes on non-archimedean topological groups

We show that the Heisenberg type group $H_X=(\Bbb{Z}_2 \oplus V) \leftthreetimes V^{\ast}$, with the discrete Boolean group $V:=C(X,\Z_2)$, canonically defined by any Stone space $X$, is always minimal. That is, $H_X$ does not admit any strictly coarser Hausdorff group topology. This leads us to the following result: for every (locally compact) non-archimedean $G$ there exists a (resp., locally compact) non-archimedean minimal group $M$ such that $G$ is a group retract of $M.$ For discrete groups $G$ the latter was proved by S. Dierolf and U. Schwanengel. We unify some old and new characterization results for non-archimedean groups. Among others we show that every continuous group action of $G$ on a Stone space $X$ is a restriction of a continuous group action by automorphisms of $G$ on a topological (even, compact) group $K$. We show also that any epimorphism $f: H \to G$ (in the category of Hausdorff topological groups) into a non-archimedean group $G$ must be dense.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.