Paper detail

Not All Models Are Equal: Predicting Model Transferability in a Self-challenging Fisher Space

This paper addresses an important problem of ranking the pre-trained deep neural networks and screening the most transferable ones for downstream tasks. It is challenging because the ground-truth model ranking for each task can only be generated by fine-tuning the pre-trained models on the target dataset, which is brute-force and computationally expensive. Recent advanced methods proposed several lightweight transferability metrics to predict the fine-tuning results. However, these approaches only capture static representations but neglect the fine-tuning dynamics. To this end, this paper proposes a new transferability metric, called \textbf{S}elf-challenging \textbf{F}isher \textbf{D}iscriminant \textbf{A}nalysis (\textbf{SFDA}), which has many appealing benefits that existing works do not have. First, SFDA can embed the static features into a Fisher space and refine them for better separability between classes. Second, SFDA uses a self-challenging mechanism to encourage different pre-trained models to differentiate on hard examples. Third, SFDA can easily select multiple pre-trained models for the model ensemble. Extensive experiments on $33$ pre-trained models of $11$ downstream tasks show that SFDA is efficient, effective, and robust when measuring the transferability of pre-trained models. For instance, compared with the state-of-the-art method NLEEP, SFDA demonstrates an average of $59.1$\% gain while bringing $22.5$x speedup in wall-clock time. The code will be available at \url{https://github.com/TencentARC/SFDA}.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.