Paper detail

Normalizer of the Chevalley group of type $E_7$

We consider the simply connected Chevalley group $G(E_7,R)$ of type $E_7$ in the 56-dimensional representation. The main objective of the paper is to prove that the following four groups coincide: the normalizer of the elementary Chevalley group $E(E_7,R)$, the normalizer of the Chevalley group $G(E_7,R)$ itself, the transporter of $E(E_7,R)$ into $G(\mathrm E_7,R)$, and the extended Chevalley group $\overline G(E_7,R)$. This holds over an arbitrary commutative ring $R$, with all normalizers and transporters being calculated in $GL(56,R)$. Moreover, we characterize $\overline G(E_7,R)$ as the stabilizer of a system of quadrics. This last result is classically known over algebraically closed fields, here we prove that the corresponding group scheme is smooth over $\mathbb Z$, which implies that it holds over arbitrary commutative rings. These results are one of the key steps in our subsequent paper, dedicated to the overgroups of exceptional groups in minimal representations.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.