Paper detail

Nonsoluble and non-p-soluble length of finite groups

Every finite group $G$ has a normal series each of whose factors either is soluble or is a direct product of nonabelian simple groups. We define the nonsoluble length $λ(G)$ as the minimum number of nonsoluble factors in a series of this kind. Upper bounds for $λ(G)$ appear in the study of various problems on finite, residually finite, and profinite groups. We prove that $λ(G)$ is bounded in terms of the maximum $2$-length of soluble subgroups of $G$, and that $λ(G)$ is bounded by the maximum Fitting height of soluble subgroups. For an odd prime $p$, the non-$p$-soluble length $λ_p(G)$ is introduced, and it is proved that $λ_p(G)$ does not exceed the maximum $p$-length of $p$-soluble subgroups. We conjecture that for a given prime $p$ and a given proper group variety ${\frak V}$ the non-$p$-soluble length $λ_p(G)$ of finite groups $G$ whose Sylow $p$-subgroups belong to ${\frak V}$ is bounded. In this paper we prove this conjecture for any variety that is a product of several soluble varieties and varieties of finite exponent.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.