Paper detail

Nonparametric Estimation of Trend in Directional Data

Consider measured positions of the paleomagnetic north pole over time. Each measured position may be viewed as a direction, expressed as a unit vector in three dimensions and incorporating some error. In this sequence, the true directions are expected to be close to one another at nearby times. A simple trend estimator that respects the geometry of the sphere is to compute a running average over the time-ordered observed direction vectors, then normalize these average vectors to unit length. This paper treats a considerably richer class of competing directional trend estimators that respect spherical geometry. The analysis relies on a nonparametric error model for directional data in $R^q$ that imposes no symmetry or other shape restrictions on the error distributions. Good trend estimators are selected by comparing estimated risks of competing estimators under the error model. Uniform laws of large numbers, from empirical process theory, establish when these estimated risks are trustworthy surrogates for the corresponding unknown risks.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.