Paper detail

Nonhomogeneous patterns on numerical semigroups

Patterns on numerical semigroups are multivariate linear polynomials, and they are said to be admissible if there exists a numerical semigroup such that evaluated at any nonincreasing sequence of elements of the semigroup gives integers belonging to the semigroup. In a first approach, only homogeneous patterns where analized. In this contribution we study conditions for an eventually non-homogeneous pattern to be admissible, and particularize this study to the case the independent term of the pattern is a multiple of the multiplicity of the semigroup. Moreover, for the so called strongly admissible patterns, the set of numerical semigroups admitting these patterns with fixed multiplicity $m$ form an $m$-variety, which allows us to represent this set in a tree and to describe minimal sets of generators of the semigroups in the variety with respect to the pattern. Furthermore, we characterize strongly admissible patterns having a finite associated tree.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.