Paper detail

Nonholonomic systems via moving frames: Cartan equivalence and Chaplygin Hamiltonization

A nonholonomic system consists of a configuration space Q, a Lagrangian L, and an nonintegrable constraint distribution H, with dynamics governed by Lagrange-d'Alembert's principle. We present two studies both using adapted moving frames. In the first study we apply Cartan's method of equivalence to investigate the geometry underlying a nonholonomic system. As an example we compute the differential invariants for a nonholonomic system on a four-dimensional configuration manifold endowed with a rank two (Engel) distribution. In the second part we study G-Chaplygin systems. These are systems where the constraint distribution is given by a connection on a principal fiber bundle with total space Q and base space S=Q/G, and with a G-equivariant Lagrangian. These systems compress to an almost Hamiltonian system on $T^{*}S$. Under an $s \in S$ dependent time reparameterization a number of compressed systems become Hamiltonian. A necessary condition for Hamiltonization is the existence of an invariant measure on the original system. Assuming an invariant measure we describe the obstruction to Hamiltonization. Chaplygin's "rubber" sphere, a ball with unequal inertia coefficients rolling without slipping or spinning (about the vertical axis) on a plane is Hamiltonizable when compressed to $T^{*}SO(3)$. Finally we discuss reduction of internal symmetries. Chaplygin's "marble" (where spinning is allowed) is not Hamiltonizable when compressed to $T^{*}SO(3)$; we conjecture that it is also not Hamiltonizable when reduced to $T^{*}S^{2}$.

preprint2004arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.