Paper detail

Nonflow contribution to Dihadron Azimuthal Correlations in 200 GeV/c Au+Au Collisions

Dihadron azimuthal correlations in 200 GeV/c Au+Au have been simulated by a multi-phase transport (AMPT) model. Contribution from jet-medium interaction to correlation function is obtained by subtracting the combined harmonic flow background from the raw dihadron correlation function. Signals in centralities of 0-10%, 20-40% and 50-80% are compared in three associated transverse momentum ($p_{T}^{assoc}$) bins: 0.2-0.8 GeV/c, 0.8-1.4 GeV/c and 1.4-2.0 GeV/c. An obvious medium modification impact can be seen from the signal shape change and relative jet contribution in the above events, which shows different behaviors between central and peripheral events, and among different $p_{T}^{assoc}$ ranges in central events. More detailed $p_{T}^{assoc}$ dependence of the derived nonflow contribution is studied in central 0-10% events, in which a strong $p_{T}^{assoc}$ dependence of RMS width is observed. We also calculated that relative jet contributions in peripheral and central collisions in the above mentioned cases.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.