Paper detail

Nonexistence of Positive Supersolutions of Nonlinear Biharmonic Equations without the Maximum Principle

We study classical positive solutions of the biharmonic inequality $-Δ^2 v \geq f(v)$ in exterior domains in $\mathbb{R}^n$ where $f:(0,\infty)\to (0,\infty)$ is continuous function. We give lower bounds on the growth of $f(s)$ at $s=0$ and/or $s=\infty$ such that this inequality has no $C^4$ positive solution in any exterior domain of $\mathbb R^n$. Similar results were obtained by Armstrong and Sirakov [ Nonexistence of positive supersolutions of elliptic equations via the maximum principle, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 36 (2011) 2011-2047] for $-Δv\ge f(v)$ using a method which depends only on properties related to the maximum principle. Since the maximum principle does not hold for the biharmonic operator, we adopt a different approach which relies on a new representation formula and an a priori pointwise bound for nonnegative solutions of $-Δ^2u \ge 0$ in a punctured neighborhood of the origin in $\mathbb{R}^n$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.