Paper detail

Nonequilibrium self-energies, Ng approach and heat current of a nanodevice for small bias voltage and temperature

Using non-equilibrium renormalized perturbation theory to second order in the renormalized Coulomb repulsion, we calculate the lesser $Σ^<$ and and greater $Σ^>$ self-energies of the impurity Anderson model, which describes the current through a quantum dot, in the general asymmetric case. While in general a numerical integration is required to evaluate the perturbative result, we derive an analytical approximation for small frequency $ω$, bias voltage $V$ and temperature $T$ which is exact to total second order in these quantities. The approximation is valid when the corresponding energies $\hbar ω$, $eV$ and $k_B T$ are small compared to $k_B T_K$, where $T_K$ is the Kondo temperature. The result of the numerical integration is compared with the analytical one and with Ng approximation, in which $Σ^<$ and $Σ^>$ are assumed proportional to the retarded self-energy $Σ^r$ times an average Fermi function. While it fails at $T=0$ for $\hbar|ω| \lesssim eV$ we find that the Ng approximation is excellent for $k_B T > eV/2$ and improves for asymmetric coupling to the leads. Even at $T=0$, the effect of the Ng approximation on the total occupation at the dot is very small. The dependence on $ω$ and $V$ are discussed in comparison with a Ward identity that is fulfilled by the three approaches. We also calculate the heat currents between the dot and any of the leads at finite bias voltage. One of the heat currents changes sign with the applied bias voltage at finite temperature.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.