Paper detail

Nonequilibrium effects in DNA microarrays: a multiplatform study

It has recently been shown that in some DNA microarrays the time needed to reach thermal equilibrium may largely exceed the typical experimental time, which is about 15h in standard protocols (Hooyberghs et al. Phys. Rev. E 81, 012901 (2010)). In this paper we discuss how this breakdown of thermodynamic equilibrium could be detected in microarray experiments without resorting to real time hybridization data, which are difficult to implement in standard experimental conditions. The method is based on the analysis of the distribution of fluorescence intensities I from different spots for probes carrying base mismatches. In thermal equilibrium and at sufficiently low concentrations, log I is expected to be linearly related to the hybridization free energy $ΔG$ with a slope equal to $1/RT_{exp}$, where $T_{exp}$ is the experimental temperature and R is the gas constant. The breakdown of equilibrium results in the deviation from this law. A model for hybridization kinetics explaining the observed experimental behavior is discussed, the so-called 3-state model. It predicts that deviations from equilibrium yield a proportionality of $\log I$ to $ΔG/RT_{eff}$. Here, $T_{eff}$ is an effective temperature, higher than the experimental one. This behavior is indeed observed in some experiments on Agilent arrays. We analyze experimental data from two other microarray platforms and discuss, on the basis of the results, the attainment of equilibrium in these cases. Interestingly, the same 3-state model predicts a (dynamical) saturation of the signal at values below the expected one at equilibrium.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.