Paper detail

Nonequilbrium work by charge control in a Josephson junction

We consider a single Josephson junction in the presence of time varying gate charge, and examine the nonequilibrium work done by the charge control in the framework of fluctuation theorems. We obtain the probability distribution functions of the works performed by forward protocol and by its time reversed protocol, which from the Crooks relation gives the estimation of the free energy changes ΔF =0. The reliability of ΔF estimated from the Jarzynksi equality is crucially dependent on protocol parameters, while Bennett's acceptance ratio method confirms consistently ΔF=0. The error of the Jarzynski estimator either grows or becomes saturated as the duration of the work protocol increases, which depends on the protocol rapidity determining the existence of the oscillatory motion of the phase difference across the junction. The average of the work also shows similar behaviors and its saturation value is given by the relative weight of the oscillatory trajectory with respect to running trajectories with constant acceleration. We discuss non-negativity of the work average and its relation to heat and entropy production associated with the circuit control.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.