Paper detail

Non-twisted stacks of coated conductors for DC magnets: analysis of inductance and AC losses

In the last 10-15 years, the most common strategy in the development of High Temperature Superconducting (HTS) cable for magnets has been to imitate Low Temperature Superconducting (LTS) cable designs. However, requirements for LTS materials are not valid for HTS materials, which are extremely stable. For example, non-twisted multifilamentary Bi-2223 tapes have been successfully used in several magnets. This paper review stability and analyse inductance and AC losses in non-twisted stack of HTS tapes. Numerical calculations show that twisting has negligible effect on inductance variations in a stack of tapes. Regarding AC losses, any magnet built with coated conductors have larger losses than LTS ones, because of the aspect ratio and large width of the tape. If a wide tape is replaced by a non-twisted stack of narrow tapes, losses and residual magnetisation could be reduced. In contrast with multifilamentary wires, twisting a stack of tapes reduces losses only marginally. Therefore, cables composed of non-twisted stack could be designed to have losses comparable to the one of twisted stack concepts. Few examples of large cables for fusion applications are discussed. Designs based on non-twisted stacks can be simpler, more robust and cost effective than twisted ones.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.