Paper detail

Non-Symmetry-Breaking Ground State of the S=1 Heisenberg Model on the Kagome lattice

The $S=1$ antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model on a Kagome lattice is studied using the density-matrix renormalization group method. To identify the ground state, we take four kinds of clusters into account; periodic, cylindrical, and two open ones. The hexagonal singlet solid (HSS) and triangular valence bond solid (TVBS) states are artificially generated by modulating edge shapes of the open clusters. We find that the energy par sites of the HSS state is $e_0=E_0/N =-1.41095$, which is readily lower than that of the TVBS state ($e_0=-1.3912 \pm 0.0025$). This agrees well with those of the cylindrical ($e_0=-1.40988$) and periodic ($e_0=-1.409 \pm 0.005$) clusters, where no assumption as to the ordering is posed. Thus, we conclude that the HSS picture is consistent to describe the ground state of the $S=1$ Kagome Heisenberg model. This is further confirmed by finding non-symmetry-breaking state in the calculations of the dimer-dimer correlation functions as well as the entanglement entropy of cylindrical clusters. Finally, we estimate the single-triplet energy gap: The HSS ground state has $Δ=0.1919$, while the TVBS excited state has a larger one $Δ=0.2797$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.