Paper detail

Non-stationary aging dynamics in ant societies

In recent experiments by Richardson et al. ((2010), PLoS ONE 5(3): e9621. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0009621) ant motion out of the nest is shown to be a non-stationary process intriguingly similar to the dynamics encountered in \emph{physical aging} of glassy systems. Specifically, exit events can be described as a Poisson process in logarithmic time, or, for short, a log-Poisson process. Nouvellet et al.(J. Theor. Biol. 266, 573. (2010)) criticized these conclusions and performed new experiments where the exit process could more simply be described by standard Poisson statistics. In their reply, (J Theor. Biol. 269, 356-358 (2011)) Richardson et al. stressed that the two sets of experiments were performed under very different conditions and claimed that this was the likely source of the discrepancy. The focal point of this work is whether log-Poisson and Poisson statistics both are possible under different external conditions. To this end, a model is introduced where interacting ants move in a stochastic fashion from one site to a neighboring site on a finite 2D lattice. The probability of each move is determined by the ensuing changes of a utility function which is a sum of pairwise interactions between ants, weighted by distance. Depending on how the interactions are defined and on a control parameter dubbed 'degree of stochasticity' (DS), the dynamics either quickly converges to a stationary state, where movements are a standard Poisson process, or may enter a non-stationary regime, where exits can be described as suggested by Richardson et al.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.