Paper detail

Non-readily identifiable data collaboration analysis for multiple datasets including personal information

Multi-source data fusion, in which multiple data sources are jointly analyzed to obtain improved information, has considerable research attention. For the datasets of multiple medical institutions, data confidentiality and cross-institutional communication are critical. In such cases, data collaboration (DC) analysis by sharing dimensionality-reduced intermediate representations without iterative cross-institutional communications may be appropriate. Identifiability of the shared data is essential when analyzing data including personal information. In this study, the identifiability of the DC analysis is investigated. The results reveals that the shared intermediate representations are readily identifiable to the original data for supervised learning. This study then proposes a non-readily identifiable DC analysis only sharing non-readily identifiable data for multiple medical datasets including personal information. The proposed method solves identifiability concerns based on a random sample permutation, the concept of interpretable DC analysis, and usage of functions that cannot be reconstructed. In numerical experiments on medical datasets, the proposed method exhibits a non-readily identifiability while maintaining a high recognition performance of the conventional DC analysis. For a hospital dataset, the proposed method exhibits a nine percentage point improvement regarding the recognition performance over the local analysis that uses only local dataset.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.