Paper detail

Non-Local Priors for High-Dimensional Estimation

Simultaneously achieving parsimony and good predictive power in high dimensions is a main challenge in statistics. Non-local priors (NLPs) possess appealing properties for high-dimensional model choice, but their use for estimation has not been studied in detail. We show that, for regular models, Bayesian model averaging (BMA) estimates based on NLPs shrink spurious parameters either at fast polynomial or quasi-exponential rates as the sample size $n$ increases (depending on the chosen prior density). Non-spurious parameter estimates only differ from the oracle MLE by a factor of $n^{-1}$. We extend some results to linear models with dimension $p$ growing with $n$. Coupled with our theoretical investigations, we outline the constructive representation of NLPs as mixtures of truncated distributions. From a practitioners' perspective, our work enables simple posterior sampling and extending NLPs beyond previous proposals. Our results show notable high-dimensional estimation for linear models with $p>>n$ at reduced computational cost. NLPs provided lower estimation error than benchmark and hyper-g priors, SCAD and LASSO in simulations, and in gene expression data achieved higher cross-validated $R^2$ with an order of magnitude less predictors. Remarkably, these results were obtained without the need to pre-screen predictors. Our findings contribute to the debate of whether different priors should be used for estimation and model selection, showing that selection priors may actually be desirable for high-dimensional estimation.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.