Paper detail

Non-invertibility in Some Heteroscedastic Models

In order to calculate the unobserved volatility in conditional heteroscedastic time series models, the natural recursive approximation is very often used. Following \cite{StraumannMikosch2006}, we will call the model \emph{invertible} if this approximation (based on true parameter vector) converges to the real volatility. Our main results are necessary and sufficient conditions for invertibility. We will show that the stationary GARCH($p$, $q$) model is always invertible, but certain types of models, such as EGARCH of \cite{Nelson1991} and VGARCH of \cite{EngleNg1993} may indeed be non-invertible. Moreover, we will demonstrate it's possible for the pair (true volatility, approximation) to have a non-degenerate stationary distribution. In such cases, the volatility estimate given by the recursive approximation with the true parameter vector is inconsistent.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.