Paper detail

Non-Ergodicity of Nose-Hoover chain thermostat in computationally achievable time

The widely used Nose-Hoover chain (NHC) thermostat in molecular dynamics simulations is generally believed to impart the canonical distribution as well as quasi- (i.e., space filling) ergodicity on the thermostatted physical system (PS). Working with the standard single harmonic oscillator, we prove analytically that the two chain Nose-Hoover thermostat with unequal thermostat masses approach the standard Nose-Hoover dynamics and hence the PS loses its canonical and quasi-ergodic nature. We also show through numerical simulations over substantially long times that for certain Poincare sections, for both the equal and unequal thermostat mass cases, the bivariate distribution function of position and momentum (${x,p}$) and of reservoir degrees of freedom ($ξ,η$) lose their Gaussian nature. Further, the 4-dimensional $x-p-ξ-η$ extended phase space exhibits two holes of non-zero measure. The NHC thermostat therefore does not generate the canonical distribution or preserve quasi-ergodicity for the PS.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.