Paper detail

Non-conservative kinetic exchange model of opinion dynamics with randomness and bounded confidence

The concept of a bounded confidence level is incorporated in a nonconservative kinetic exchange model of opinion dynamics model where opinions have continuous values $\in [-1,1]$. The characteristics of the unrestricted model, which has one parameter $λ$ representing conviction, undergo drastic changes with the introduction of bounded confidence parametrised by $δ$. Three distinct regions are identified in the phase diagram in the $δ-λ$ plane and the evidences of a first order phase transition for $δ\geq 0.3$ are presented. A neutral state with all opinions equal to zero occurs for $λ\leq λ_{c_1} \simeq 2/3$, independent of $δ$, while for $λ_{c_1} \leq λ\leq λ_{c_2}(δ)$, an ordered region is seen to exist where opinions of only one sign prevail. At $λ_{c_2}(δ)$, a transition to a disordered state is observed, where individual opinions of both signs coexist and move closer to the extreme values ($\pm 1$) as $λ$ is increased. For confidence level $δ< 0.3$, the ordered phase exists for a narrow range of $λ$ only. The line $δ= 0$ is apparently a line of discontinuity and this limit is discussed in some detail.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.