Paper detail

Non-autoregressive electron flow generation for reaction prediction

Reaction prediction is a fundamental problem in computational chemistry. Existing approaches typically generate a chemical reaction by sampling tokens or graph edits sequentially, conditioning on previously generated outputs. These autoregressive generating methods impose an arbitrary ordering of outputs and prevent parallel decoding during inference. We devise a novel decoder that avoids such sequential generating and predicts the reaction in a Non-Autoregressive manner. Inspired by physical-chemistry insights, we represent edge edits in a molecule graph as electron flows, which can then be predicted in parallel. To capture the uncertainty of reactions, we introduce latent variables to generate multi-modal outputs. Following previous works, we evaluate our model on USPTO MIT dataset. Our model achieves both an order of magnitude lower inference latency, with state-of-the-art top-1 accuracy and comparable performance on Top-K sampling.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.