Non-Autonomous Forms and Invariance

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

We generalize the Beurling--Deny--Ouhabaz criterion for parabolic evolution equations governed by forms to the non-autonomous, non-homogeneous and semilinear case. Let V,HV, H are Hilbert spaces such that VV is continuously and densely embedded in HH and let A(t) ⁣:V→V′\mathcal{A}(t)\colon V\to V^\prime be the operator associated with a bounded HH-elliptic form a(t,.,.) ⁣:V×V→C\mathfrak{a}(t,.,.)\colon V\times V \to \mathbb{C} for all t∈[0,T]t \in [0,T]. Suppose C⊂H\mathcal{C} \subset H is closed and convex and P ⁣:H→HP \colon H \to H the orthogonal projection onto C\mathcal{C}. Given f∈L2(0,T;V′)f \in L^2(0,T;V') and u0∈Cu_0\in \mathcal{C}, we investigate whenever the solution of the non-autonomous evolutionary problem u′(t)+A(t)u(t)=f(t),u(0)=u0, u'(t)+\mathcal{A}(t)u(t)=f(t), \quad u(0)=u_0, remains in C\mathcal{C} and show that this is the case if Pu(t) \in V \quad \text{and} \quad \operatorname{Re} \mathfrak{a}(t,Pu(t),u(t)-Pu(t)) \ge \operatorname{Re} \langle f(t), u(t)-Pu(t) \rangle for a.e.\ t∈[0,T]t \in [0,T]. Moreover, we examine necessity of this condition and apply this result to a semilinear problem.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.