Paper detail

Non-Adaptive Group Testing with Inhibitors

Group testing with inhibitors (GTI) introduced by Farach at al. is studied in this paper. There are three types of items, $d$ defectives, $r$ inhibitors and $n-d-r$ normal items in a population of $n$ items. The presence of any inhibitor in a test can prevent the expression of a defective. For this model, we propose a probabilistic non-adaptive pooling design with a low complexity decoding algorithm. We show that the sample complexity of the number of tests required for guaranteed recovery with vanishing error probability using the proposed algorithm scales as $T=O(d \log n)$ and $T=O(\frac{r^2}{d}\log n)$ in the regimes $r=O(d)$ and $d=o(r)$ respectively. In the former regime, the number of tests meets the lower bound order while in the latter regime, the number of tests is shown to exceed the lower bound order by a $\log \frac{r}{d}$ multiplicative factor. When only upper bounds on the number of defectives $D$ and the number of inhibitors $R$ are given instead of their exact values, the sample complexity of the number of tests using the proposed algorithm scales as $T=O(D \log n)$ and $T=O(R^2 \log n)$ in the regimes $R^2=O(D)$ and $D=o(R^2)$ respectively. In the former regime, the number of tests meets the lower bound order while in the latter regime, the number of tests exceeds the lower bound order by a $\log R$ multiplicative factor. The time complexity of the proposed decoding algorithms scale as $O(nT)$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.