Paper detail

Non-Abelian Dirac node braiding and near-degeneracy of correlated phases at odd integer filling in magic angle twisted bilayer graphene

We use the DMRG to study the correlated electron states favored by the Coulomb interaction projected onto the narrow bands of twisted bilayer graphene within a spinless one-valley model. The Hilbert space of the narrow bands is constructed from a pair of hybrid Wannier states with opposite Chern numbers. Depending on the parameters in the BM model, the DMRG in this basis determines the ground state at one particle per unit cell to be either QAH state or a state with no Hall effect which is nearly a product state. Based on this form, we then apply the variational method to study their competition, thus identifying three states: the QAH, a gapless $C_2T$ symmetric nematic, and a gapped $C_2T$ symmetric stripe. All three states are nearly degenerate at the realistic parameters of the BM model. The single particle spectrum of the nematic contains either a quadratic node or two close Dirac nodes near $Γ$. Motivated by the Landau level degeneracy found in this state, we propose it to be the state observed at the charge neutrality point once spin and valley degeneracies are restored. The optimal period for the $C_2T$ stripe state is found to be $2$ unit cells. In addition, using the fact that the topological charge of the nodes in the $C_2T$ nematic phase is no longer described simply by their winding numbers once the translation symmetry is broken, but rather by certain elements of a non-Abelian group that was recently pointed out, we identify the mechanism of the gap opening within the $C_2T$ stripe state. Although the nodes at the Fermi energy are locally stable, they can be annihilated after braiding with other nodes connecting them to adjacent (folded) bands. Therefore, if the translation symmetry is broken, the gap at one particle per unit cell can open even if the system preserves the $C_2T$ and valley $U(1)$ symmetries, and the gap to remote bands remains open.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.