Paper detail

Noisy Random Boolean Formulae - a Statistical Physics Perspective

Typical properties of computing circuits composed of noisy logical gates are studied using the statistical physics methodology. A growth model that gives rise to typical random Boolean functions is mapped onto a layered Ising spin system, which facilitates the study of their ability to represent arbitrary formulae with a given level of error, the tolerable level of gate-noise, and its dependence on the formulae depth and complexity, the gates used and properties of the function inputs. Bounds on their performance, derived in the information theory literature via specific gates, are straightforwardly retrieved, generalized and identified as the corresponding typical-case phase transitions. The framework is employed for deriving results on error-rates, function-depth and sensitivity, and their dependence on the gate-type and noise model used that are difficult to obtain via the traditional methods used in this field.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.