Paper detail

Noisy linear inverse problems under convex constraints: Exact risk asymptotics in high dimensions

In the standard Gaussian linear measurement model $Y=Xμ_0+ξ\in \mathbb{R}^m$ with a fixed noise level $σ>0$, we consider the problem of estimating the unknown signal $μ_0$ under a convex constraint $μ_0 \in K$, where $K$ is a closed convex set in $\mathbb{R}^n$. We show that the risk of the natural convex constrained least squares estimator (LSE) $\hatμ(σ)$ can be characterized exactly in high dimensional limits, by that of the convex constrained LSE $\hatμ_K^{\mathsf{seq}}$ in the corresponding Gaussian sequence model at a different noise level. The characterization holds (uniformly) for risks in the maximal regime that ranges from constant order all the way down to essentially the parametric rate, as long as certain necessary non-degeneracy condition is satisfied for $\hatμ(σ)$. The precise risk characterization reveals a fundamental difference between noiseless (or low noise limit) and noisy linear inverse problems in terms of the sample complexity for signal recovery. A concrete example is given by the isotonic regression problem: While exact recovery of a general monotone signal requires $m\gg n^{1/3}$ samples in the noiseless setting, consistent signal recovery in the noisy setting requires as few as $m\gg \log n$ samples. Such a discrepancy occurs when the low and high noise risk behavior of $\hatμ_K^{\mathsf{seq}}$ differ significantly. In statistical languages, this occurs when $\hatμ_K^{\mathsf{seq}}$ estimates $0$ at a faster `adaptation rate' than the slower `worst-case rate' for general signals. Several other examples, including non-negative least squares and generalized Lasso (in constrained forms), are also worked out to demonstrate the concrete applicability of the theory in problems of different types.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.