Paper detail

No metrics with Positive Scalar Curvatures on Aspherical 5-Manifolds

A metric space $X$ is called uniformly acyclic if there there exists an {\it acyclicty control function} $R=R(r)=R_X(r)\geq r $, $0\leq r <\infty$, such that the homology inclusion homomorphisms between the balls around all points $x\in X$, $$H_i(B_x(r))\to H_i(B_x(R))$$ vanish for all $i=1,2,\ldots$. We show that if a complete orientable $m$-dimensional manifold $\tilde X$ of dimension $m\leq 5$ admits a proper (infinity goes to infinity) distance decreasing map to a complete $m$-dimensional uniformly acyclic manifold, then the scalar curvature of $\tilde X$ can't be uniformly positive, $$\inf _{x\in \tilde X}Sc(X,x) \leq 0.$$ Since the universal coverings $\tilde X$ of compact aspherical manifolds $X$ are {\it uniformly acyclic}, (in fact, {\it uniformly contractible}), these $X$, admit no metrics with $Sc>0$ for $dim (X)\leq 5$. Our argument, that depends on {\it torical symmetrization} of {\it stable $μ$-bubbles}, is inspired by the recent paper by Otis Chodosh and Chao Li on non-existence of metrics with $Sc>0$ on aspherical 4-manifolds and is also influenced by the ideas of Jintian Zhu and Thomas Richard.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.