Paper detail

NN-based Transformation of Any SQL Cardinality Estimator for Handling DISTINCT, AND, OR and NOT

SQL queries, with the AND, OR, and NOT operators, constitute a broad class of highly used queries. Thus, their cardinality estimation is important for query optimization. In addition, a query planner requires the set-theoretic cardinality (i.e., without duplicates) for queries with DISTINCT as well as in planning; for example, when considering sorting options. Yet, despite the importance of estimating query cardinalities in the presence of DISTINCT, AND, OR, and NOT, many cardinality estimation methods are limited to estimating cardinalities of only conjunctive queries with duplicates counted. The focus of this work is on two methods for handling this deficiency that can be applied to any limited cardinality estimation model. First, we describe a specialized deep learning scheme, PUNQ, which is tailored to representing conjunctive SQL queries and predicting the percentage of unique rows in the query's result with duplicate rows. Using the predicted percentages obtained via PUNQ, we are able to transform any cardinality estimation method that only estimates for conjunctive queries, and which estimates cardinalities with duplicates (e.g., MSCN), to a method that estimates queries cardinalities without duplicates. This enables estimating cardinalities of queries with the DISTINCT keyword. In addition, we describe a recursive algorithm, GenCrd, for extending any cardinality estimation method M that only handles conjunctive queries to one that estimates cardinalities for more general queries (that include AND, OR, and NOT), without changing the method M itself. Our evaluation is carried out on a challenging, real-world database with general queries that include either the DISTINCT keyword or the AND, OR, and NOT operators. Experimentally, we show that the proposed methods obtain accurate cardinality estimates with the same level of accuracy as that of the original transformed methods.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.