Paper detail

NLO NRQCD disfavors the interpretation of X(3872) as $χ_{c1}(2P)$

We study $χ_{c1}(2P)$ inclusive hadroproduction at next-to-leading order (NLO), both in $α_s$ and $v^2$, within the factorization formalism of nonrelativistic quantum chromodynamics (NRQCD), including the color-singlet $^3P_1^{[1]}$ and color-octet $^3S_1^{[8]}$ $c\bar c$ Fock states as well as the mixing of the latter with the $^3D_1^{[8]}$ state. Assuming the recently discovered X(3872) hadron to be the $J^{PC}=1^{++}$ charmonium state $χ_{c1}(2P)$, we perform a fit to the cross sections measured by the CDF, CMS, and LHCb Collaborations. We either obtain an unacceptably high value of $χ^2$, a value of $|R_{2P}^\prime(0)|$ incompatible with well-established potential models, or an intolerable violation of the NRQCD velocity rules. We thus conclude that NLO NRQCD is inconsistent with the hypothesis $X(3872)\equivχ_{c1}(2P)$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.