Paper detail

Newtonian gravitational constant measurement. All atomic variables become extreme when using a source mass consisting of 3 or more parts

Atomic interferometry methods used to measure the Newtonian gravitational constant. To improve the accuracy, one should measure the phase of an atomic interferometer at extreme values of atomic vertical velocities and coordinates. Owing to symmetry, the horizontal components of atomic velocities and coordinates are also extreme. We propose using a source mass consisting of 3 or more parts, since only in this case one can find such an arrangement of parts that all atomic variables become extreme. Nonlinear dependences of the phase on the uncertainties of atomic positions and velocities near those extreme values required us to modify the expression for the phase relative standard deviation (RSD). Moreover, taking into account nonlinear terms in the phase dependence on the atomic coordinates and velocities leads to a phase shift. In the last experiment to measure the Newtonian gravitational constant by atomic interferometry, this shift was not included. We took the shift into account, got a value of 199ppm for it, and this leads to a decrease in the value of the Newton constant by 0.02%. In addition, we showed that at equal sizes of the atomic cloud in the vertical and horizontal directions, as well as at equal atomic vertical and transverse temperatures, systematic errors due to the finite size and temperature of the cloud disappear. The calculation also showed that when using the 13-ton source mass proposed recently, the measurement accuracy can reach 17ppm for a source mass consisting of 4 quarters. We assumed that the source mass consisting of a set of cylinders is used for measurements. We have obtained a new analytical expression for the gravitational field of a homogeneous cylinder.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.