Paper detail

New Physics Patterns in $\varepsilon^\prime/\varepsilon$ and $\varepsilon_K$ with Implications for Rare Kaon Decays and $ΔM_K$

The SM prediction for the ratio $\varepsilon^\prime/\varepsilon$ appears to be significantly below the experimental data. Also $\varepsilon_K$ in the SM tends to be below the data. Any NP removing these anomalies will first of all have impact on flavour observables in the $K$ meson system, in particular on rare $K$ decays and $ΔM_K$. Restricting the operators contributing to $\varepsilon^\prime/\varepsilon$ to the SM ones and to the corresponding primed operators, NP contributions are quite generally dominated either by QCD penguin (QCDP) operators $Q_6(Q_6^\prime)$ or electroweak penguin (EWP) operators $Q_8(Q_8^\prime)$ with rather different implications for other flavour observables. We discuss general models with tree-level $Z$ and $Z^\prime$ flavour violating exchanges and few specific models. We find that simultaneous enhancements of $\varepsilon^\prime/\varepsilon$, $\varepsilon_K$, $\mathcal{B}(K_L\toπ^0ν\barν)$ and $\mathcal{B}(K^+\toπ^+ν\barν)$ in $Z$ scenarios are only possible in the presence of both LH and RH flavour-violating couplings. In $Z^\prime$ scenarios this is not required but the size of NP effects and the correlation between $\mathcal{B}(K_L\toπ^0ν\barν)$ and $\mathcal{B}(K^+\toπ^+ν\barν)$ depends strongly on whether QCDP or EWP dominate NP contributions to $\varepsilon^\prime/\varepsilon$. In the QCDP case possible enhancements of both branching ratios are much larger than for EWP scenario and take place only on the branch parallel to the Grossman-Nir bound, which is in the case of EWP dominance only possible in the absence of NP in $\varepsilon_K$. QCDP and EWP scenarios of NP in $\varepsilon^\prime/\varepsilon$ can also be uniquely distinguished by the size and the sign of NP contribution to $ΔM_K$, elevating the importance of the precise calculation of $ΔM_K$ in the SM.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.