Paper detail

New Insights into Learning with Correntropy Based Regression

Stemming from information-theoretic learning, the correntropy criterion and its applications to machine learning tasks have been extensively explored and studied. Its application to regression problems leads to the robustness enhanced regression paradigm -- namely, correntropy based regression. Having drawn a great variety of successful real-world applications, its theoretical properties have also been investigated recently in a series of studies from a statistical learning viewpoint. The resulting big picture is that correntropy based regression regresses towards the conditional mode function or the conditional mean function robustly under certain conditions. Continuing this trend and going further, in the present study, we report some new insights into this problem. First, we show that under the additive noise regression model, such a regression paradigm can be deduced from minimum distance estimation, implying that the resulting estimator is essentially a minimum distance estimator and thus possesses robustness properties. Second, we show that the regression paradigm, in fact, provides a unified approach to regression problems in that it approaches the conditional mean, the conditional mode, as well as the conditional median functions under certain conditions. Third, we present some new results when it is utilized to learn the conditional mean function by developing its error bounds and exponential convergence rates under conditional $(1+ε)$-moment assumptions. The saturation effect on the established convergence rates, which was observed under $(1+ε)$-moment assumptions, still occurs, indicating the inherent bias of the regression estimator. These novel insights deepen our understanding of correntropy based regression, help cement the theoretic correntropy framework, and also enable us to investigate learning schemes induced by general bounded nonconvex loss functions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.