Paper detail

New Fluctuation Theorem on Maxwell's Demon

With the increasing interest for the control of the system at the nano and mesoscopic scales, studies have been focused on the limit of the energy dissipation in an open system by refining the concept of the Maxwell's demon. The well-known Sagawa-Ueda fluctuation theorem provides an explanation of the demon: the absence of a part of demon's information leads to an improper entropy production which violates the thermodynamic 2nd law. Realizing that the demon contributes not only to the system but also to the environments, we introduce the dissipative information to quantify the total contribution of the demon, rather than using an improper entropy production. We prove a set of new fluctuation theorems based on this, which can be used to uncover the truth behind the demon: The controlled system does not violate the 2nd law at any coarse-grained level for the demon's control. However, there exists an inevitable demon-induced dissipative information which always increases the entropy production. A consequence of these theorems is that, less work and more heat can be extracted and generated respectively by a demon than the limits predicted by the Ueda-Sagawa theorem. We also suggest a possible realization of the experimental estimation of these work and heat bounds, which can be measured and tested.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.