Paper detail

New estimates for network sampling

Network sampling is used around the world for surveys of vulnerable, hard-to-reach populations including people at risk for HIV, opioid misuse, and emerging epidemics. The sampling methods include tracing social links to add new people to the sample. Current estimates from these surveys are inaccurate, with large biases and mean squared errors and unreliable confidence intervals. New estimators are introduced here which eliminate almost all of the bias, have much lower mean squared error, and enable confidence intervals with good properties. The improvement is attained by avoiding unrealistic assumptions about the population network and the design, instead using the topology of the sample network data together with the sampling design actually used. In simulations using the real network of an at-risk population, the new estimates eliminate almost all the bias and have mean squared-errors that are 2 to 92 times lower than those of current estimators. The new estimators are effective with a wide variety of network designs including those with strongly restricted branching such as Respondent-Driven Sampling and freely branching designs such as Snowball Sampling.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.